7 ms·
You have to consider that people got paid coming up with this nonsense. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. That is before looking at the new designs and how hor
by BoxwoodSeed 2mo ago
You have to consider that people got paid coming up with this nonsense.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
That is before looking at the new designs and how horrible they all are.
- dtagames 2mo agoAnd the site! Is it 1996? Impossible to navigate. Tiny photos. Zero information about contest parameters or where the "birds and buildings" (all the same) came from.
- mnewme 2mo agoThere is enough info online, this is just the survey. Yes site looks like shit, but cool they ask the people.
- dtagames 2mo agoThe actual page announcing the contestants is terrible and missing the info I'm complaining about. The survey is arguably worse. It just ask people to choose among random bills. But that's not how the contest will work. They'll choose one artist's entire submission, not the most popular individual bills from the survey.
- mnewme 2mo agoI don’t really get why this gets so much hate. Seems like this is the era of Eurohate. I think it is great that people get asked for their opinion, why not.
- BoxwoodSeed 2mo agoIt's a waste of resources to make something that exists worse.
- mnewme 2mo agoIn the big picture, the amount of resources poured into this contest is probably close to 0%. Also why worse? Some great designs out there.
- BoxwoodSeed 2mo agoThe existing designs are fine, are they not? Even if they only spent a single Euro on all of this, which I doubt, it would still be a wasted Euro.