5 ms·

I don't think they were saying that there aren't reasons to not use github, in or out of the USA, but rather that codeberg was already not a contender for many

by abeyer 2mo ago

I don't think they were saying that there aren't reasons to not use github, in or out of the USA, but rather that codeberg was already not a contender for many use cases due to their existing rules restricting private/non-OSS repos.

nottorp 2mo ago
It's apples to oranges. No matter how many reasons one has to avoid github, Codeberg is only an alternative for open source hosting. Are there any alternatives that you could use for closed source development that aren't owned by US entities?
- inigyou 2mo ago
  Self hosted Forgejo
  - nottorp 2mo ago
    Self hosted gitlab etc. What if you can't be bothered and would rather pay a symbolic subscription, like what github offers?
    - inigyou 2mo ago
      Be the change you want to see. Nobody is doing that outside the US because they can't get business away from GitHub, apparently.
      - nottorp 2mo ago
        And of course when they do try they have nothing like github's $7/month (now $4) base subscription. They want 19.99 per user per month. And then they wonder why they go bankrupt like those dignified German car manufacturers. It's because people can't afford them.