6 ms·—–—, I believe.by cm11 2mo ago—–—, I believe.jerf 2mo agoOof, yes.Timwi 2mo agoThat depends. Your interpretation is “em+en+em”. But another, potentially wittier interpretation is “em in em”, i.e., you split an em-dash into two en-dashes and put an em-dash inside.jerf 2mo agoHeh, thanks for the attempted recovery but I definitely meant the other way around.cm11 2mo agoNice, that's good.