13 ms·

Seriously, the entire separation of Bluesky from ATProto not happening is my main reason for not trusting it at all. You can't have a protocol owned by a for-pr

Seriously, the entire separation of Bluesky from ATProto not happening is my main reason for not trusting it at all. You can't have a protocol owned by a for-profit entity and seriously call it "open"

steveklabnik 2mo ago
https://atproto.com/blog/kicking-off-the-atp-working-group https://atproto.com/blog/kicking-off-the-atp-working-group https://docs.bsky.app/blog/plc-directory-org https://docs.bsky.app/blog/plc-directory-org
- polymer8563 2mo ago
  None of these make ATProto removed from Bluesky, the working group scope is not clear from the article either.
blackqueeriroh 2mo ago
Huh. Tell that to LSP, QUIC, SPDY, GraphQL, WebRTC, BitTorrent, HTTP/2, and other protocols. I guess they weren’t “open” either for the first 5-10 years of their existence either? Weird.
- inigyou 2mo ago
  Yes? Correct?