6 ms·
I have no reason to care about the interests of these companies. My interests are best served with a competitive selection of open weights models available for
by commoner 2mo ago
I have no reason to care about the interests of these companies. My interests are best served with a competitive selection of open weights models available for my use.
OpenAI has the year-old GPT-OSS, and Anthropic has never released any open weights models. Meanwhile, other companies are delivering a steady stream of high-quality open weights models every month, and I'm not going to stop using them just because some other people don't like the country they were developed in.
- dd8601fn 2mo agoI can’t say this enough… Expect the tap on open models to slow and eventually disappear. They don’t exist for altruistic reasons. It’s peculiar to current conditions.
- commoner 2mo agoUnlike Claude Fable, once an open weights model is released, it's available forever (or at least until every copy is lost or deleted, which won't be soon). Open weights models are already great, and the ones that are already released will continue to be just as good as they are today even if newer versions are released at a different speed in the future.
- dd8601fn 2mo agoA year from now we won’t care that today’s qwen is good enough for some stuff. But yes, it’ll still be available.
- Levitz 2mo ago>My interests are best served with a competitive selection of open weights models available for my use. Which is why Chinese companies use people like you. Sorry for being blunt but if you think this policy would continue in a scenario in which they are hegemonic you are extremely delusional. Also: >I'm not going to stop using them just because some other people don't like the country they were developed in. This is not a serious sentence, but a preposterous, straw-manning assertion to make, and it borders on the insult.