6 ms·

Those are licenses for API access to data too new to be in the training data (for use by agents), not for the training itself. I don't really understand why yo

• usef- 2mo ago
  It isn't just that, it includes publishing houses, Wiley etc, and non-live media. Even the news orgs say explicitly in the press releases that it's about training on their archive eg. http://ap.org/media-center/press-releases/2023/ap-open-ai-agree-to-share-select-news-content-and-technology-in-new-collaboration http://ap.org/media-center/press-releases/2023/ap-open-ai-ag... --- edit, examples: Wiley https://newsroom.wiley.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2025/Wiley-Partners-with-Anthropic-to-Accelerate-Responsible-AI-Integration-Across-Scholarly-Research/default.aspx https://newsroom.wiley.com/press-releases/press-release-deta... Shutterstock https://investor.shutterstock.com/news-releases/news-release-details/shutterstock-expands-partnership-openai-signs-new-six-year https://investor.shutterstock.com/news-releases/news-release... Axel Springer https://openai.com/index/axel-springer-partnership https://openai.com/index/axel-springer-partnership Stack Overflow: https://stackoverflow.co/partnerships https://stackoverflow.co/partnerships Disney (for characters in video. Video is especially where licensing is a big difference internationally right now) https://openai.com/index/disney-sora-agreement https://openai.com/index/disney-sora-agreement etc. The news corp one had a leaked price ($250mill), so they don't seem to be insignificant. These would have to be included in API prices I presume.