6 ms·
Saying GPT 5.6 Sol is 1:1 with Fable is laughable. OpenAI models are braindead in comparison and I have hundreds of hours with both.
by braebo 2mo ago
Saying GPT 5.6 Sol is 1:1 with Fable is laughable. OpenAI models are braindead in comparison and I have hundreds of hours with both.
- deepvibrations 2mo agoNo doubt Fable can outperform on many coding tasks, but the way you phrase it really exaggerates the gap and I'd suggest that for 95% of tasks, most devs simply don't need Fable level, and in fact, despite mostly using Claude, I have found codex is generally quicker at most tasks and can be even better than Fable with certain languages.
- aroman 2mo agoYou have hundreds of hours with a model that was barely even released hundreds of hours ago? The perception of capability varies greatly between task. For my needs for example sol xhigh consistently outperforms fable xhigh.
- jayd16 2mo agoYou could run hundreds of agents in parallel and arguably that counts.
- aroman 2mo agoNo, it wouldn’t. The hours in question are human experience, not that of the agent.
- jayd16 2mo agoWhy not? You have far more results to review. If you run a model on slower hardware are you getting more experience? Surely its a factor of model output reviewed and not human time.
- aroman 2mo agoRight, it's about how much time the human spent - the time spent by the machine itself is irrelevant. As you rightly point out: that is why we measure programmer experience by wall clock time, not CPU time :)