7 ms·
https://lists.isocpp.org/std-proposals/att-0486/Reply_to_Zero-overhead_deterministic_exceptions:_Throwing.pdf https://lists.isocpp.org/std-proposals/att-0486/Re
by never_inline 2mo ago
https://lists.isocpp.org/std-proposals/att-0486/Reply_to_Zero-overhead_deterministic_exceptions:_Throwing.pdf https://lists.isocpp.org/std-proposals/att-0486/Reply_to_Zer...
Here's a paper by a non native English speaker. The lack of the formal style doesn't cause any issue. Preciseness is what matters.
- rcxdude 2mo agoTo your tastes maybe. Will it get through the editor's desk at a scientific journal as easily?
- JadeNB 2mo agoIt seems to me like we're saying the same thing. I'm saying that there is a practical bias, as in, it's there in the real world whether we like it or not, that can prevent some papers from appearing just because of limitations on English-language fluency, not because of any lack of scientific content. One solution is to get rid of it, but that's a long-term project. If we have an immediate remedy that works, if the authors still take responsibility for the scientific content, and if the use of the tool that provides that remedy is responsibly disclosed, then it seems like a win all around, except perhaps that it makes the need for the longer-term solution less obvious.