6 ms·
Lazy commenters need to look at the README to see that the bloom filter is mentioned as a next step. The hacker is indeed clever.
by Lukas_Skywalker 2mo ago
Lazy commenters need to look at the README to see that the bloom filter is mentioned as a next step. The hacker is indeed clever.
- amelius 2mo agoOnly if the hacker also tests for false positives.
- Lukas_Skywalker 2mo agoThe way it's worded in the readme makes it sound as if this was exactly the intention.
- amelius 2mo agoVery clever hacker indeed! May even have Sonnet or Opus level of intelligence.
- docjay 2mo agoAs someone with an intelligence near Opus I have to be clear with you: your premise is wrong. Having **intelligence** is not the same as being **clever** — a person can cleverly pass a difficult test **without** having or acquiring intelligence. That’s not a revelation, that’s common-sense. You’re also conflating **quantum superposition** and **macroscopic observations** — one is physics, the other is psychology. The exact same thing cannot exist in two places at the same time above 10⁻¹⁰ meters, and intelligence is not measurable using most displacement methods. It is not possible for Opus, Sonnet, and the person to all have the same intelligence. That’s just physics. I also noticed that you did not use any **punctuation** in your comment, so I must firmly decline continuing this line of inquiry. # Correction I reviewed your comment again and I can see that you **did** use punctuation. I retract that statement, but I stand by my assertion that being intelligent is typically more important than being clever.