6 ms·
Yes, it's had a lot of money put through it since its early days, with quirky shortcuts and quirky features. Imagine if they made Gimp good, this would be what
by keyle 2mo ago
Yes, it's had a lot of money put through it since its early days, with quirky shortcuts and quirky features.
Imagine if they made Gimp good, this would be what blender became in 3D.
They've done it right, with a foundation and it appears to run like clockwork. Feature wise it now rivals with some pretty expensive alternatives.
Open source; can win!
- Joel_Mckay 2mo agohttps://krita.org/en/ https://krita.org/en/ It is also free. =3
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- KPGv2 2mo ago> Imagine if they made Gimp good, I have a vague recollection that twenty years ago GIMP paid some designers to come up with a great UI, but once the design was ready, GIMP was like "nah we don't like that" and kept their bad UI. I do image stuff so rarely that GIMP is fine because it's free. But its UI is so bad. I don't know about now, but I remember a few years ago someone pointed out that GIMP had over a million dollars in a Bitcoin wallet and hadn't touched any of it in like a decade.
- bigyabai 2mo agoFor minimal edits, Pinta does the job IMO: https://www.pinta-project.com/ https://www.pinta-project.com/ Gimp still has a lot of good features that I find myself crawling back for, on bigger projects. But Pinta has that good ol' fashioned Paint.NET feel to it that a lot of people still strive for.
- mghackerlady 2mo agoFor even more minimal edits, I still use xpaint