5 ms·
You're the one wanting to generate that though
by blizzard_dev_17 2mo ago
You're the one wanting to generate that though
- jdiff 2mo agoNo other model is so easy to generate such things. No model is so negligent in adding safeguards. I've seen it generate such things in response to a post that was clearly labeled as a 4th grader. The person you are talking to is responding to instances like that. They're not asking for it, that's obnoxiously silly and disingenuous.
- exodust 2mo agoSounds like you've tried generating such things. You've seen things people wouldn't believe. Inappropriate AI images off the shoulder of Orion, etc. Now the counter-weight over-compensation. Insisting the tool "doesn't have enough safeguards". Could it be that our AI usage innocence is related to how much we criticise the tool for not policing us enough? Meanwhile the rest of us have never seen such images because we're not looking for those images, or trying to prompt for those images, or thinking about those images. How about the people using these tools take responsibility, rather than forcing colossal layers of safeguards on everything and everyone?
- Lomlioto 2mo agoIt started by school kids generating images of their peers. Researchers and police investigated this -> experts. People found out (like the researches and investigators) that its very easy to generate this type of content. Elon Musk himself though absolutly knows about this and how easy is to generate porn. Its his thing, freedom before anything else. Why would anyone tell the richest person on the planet what he can or can't do. Its disappointing to see that you don't think that the richest person on the planet doesn't need to do more to protect miss use but reframe it like this.
- exodust 2mo ago> "Elon Musk himself though absolutly knows about this and how easy is to generate porn." Your claim directly contradicts Musk's statement on the issue: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2011432649353511350 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2011432649353511350 Your claim also doesn't align with actual testing of the platform. This raises the question, why are you here posting disinformation?
- Lomlioto 2mo ago[flagged]
- jdiff 2mo agoThis is in headlines, dude. This smear attempt is intellectually dishonest and eyeroll inducing.
- exodust 2mo agoYou said: "I've seen it generate such things" By your own admission, you've seen it generate such things. Meanwhile, I've never seen it generate such things because I don't write sicko prompts, and the guardrails in place prevent such images. Most people have never seen it generate such things, but apparently you have. I couldn't be more intellectually honest if I tried.