6 ms·
their parents won't protect them and everyone else has to pay for it. maybe they shouldn't have been allowed to have kids.
by leonvoss 2mo ago
their parents won't protect them and everyone else has to pay for it. maybe they shouldn't have been allowed to have kids.
- inigyou 2mo agoNothing could possibly go wrong with eugenics
- moi2388 2mo agoIt can, but we’re quite good at it with all animals and plants..
- account42 2mo agoIf you mean that we can breed subservient cripples then sure.
- BoingBoomTschak 2mo agoThe Idiocracy scenario we've stepped into isn't much better...
- bennettnate5 2mo agoIt is. It's far from good, but it's much better than eugenics.
- undersuit 2mo agoThe governments won't protect them either. The governments are the ones enabling these corporations to exist and facilitate harm towards children. Maybe they shouldn't be allowed to have those corporations.
- inigyou 2mo agoAnd then the moment the government does do something, "it's a totalitarian power grab!!!111"
- roundabout-host 2mo agoThey are doing something which is not a solution but can fake being a solution, so that the masses will accept it. An actual solution would be to regulate these social media, to prohibit addictive and manipulative algorithms.
- aa-jv 2mo agoMaybe OS vendors should stop trying to sell ads and instead fix their operating systems so that parents can responsibly monitor their children's online activity in a way that promotes both parental responsibility, and children's human rights ... but of course, that would require OS vendors to stop selling ads.