7 ms·

The article explains very clearly what these issues have to do with each other in this particular case.

• titanomachy 2mo ago
  I don’t agree. Whether or not these girls had phones, or social media, was irrelevant in this case. And I’ve never heard anyone seriously argue that 16-year-olds shouldn’t have phones, or that 16-year-old girls are at fault when an old man secretly makes videos of them. Both these groups seem like imagined bogeymen that the article is railing against.
  • nyeah 2mo ago
    >Whether or not these girls had phones, or social media, was irrelevant The article explains why that was not irrelevant.
    • cmoski 2mo ago
      Who is saying 16yos shouldn't have phones though?
    • deleted 2mo ago
      [deleted]
• JSR_FDED 2mo ago
  Maybe if you have a certain frame of reference? I found it impenetrable.