5 ms·
I think the key word was "intrinsically". It's like public photography, it's intrinsically legal, except when it's a Flock camera and then it's suddenly an inv
by parasense 2mo ago
I think the key word was "intrinsically".
It's like public photography, it's intrinsically legal, except when it's a Flock camera and then it's suddenly an invasion of privacy.
- nativeit 2mo agoA Flock camera isn’t an invasion of privacy. Fleets of hundreds or thousands of Flock cameras feeding into a massive dataset is definitely an invasion of privacy, and hardly sudden.
- tadfisher 2mo agoMore precisely: pinpointing you at a given place and time does not need a warrant. Collecting many such pinpoints, allowing authorities to reconstruct your exact movements at some point in the future (without needing to flag you or issue a BOLO or whatever), does.