6 ms·

Notably, nothing to do with jellyfish.

by rendaw 2mo ago

fwipsy 2mo ago
I think certain titles do well because they become a sort of unintentional clickbait. I absolutely expected this to be about marine biology. The original title, "World's First Undersea Roundabout," is much clearer. </crotchety_old_man>
- Razengan 2mo ago
  This is actually where LLMs save us from scummy human clickbait and shit, I can just ask ChatGPT etc to summarize an article and go on with my life while the AI suffers :')
  - unkeen 2mo ago
    Whilst the world suffers because more and more let's say "not entirely climate-neutral" data centres are being built beause you were to lazy to read an article you mean.
    - vixen99 2mo ago
      Nothing to stop you making assumptions if you feel you have to.
    - paulluuk 2mo ago
      It depends on so many factors. Reading a long article on your laptop is likely less efficient than letting an LLM summarize it for you and then only reading the summary, while reading the article on your phone would be even more efficient. There are a lot of very contradictory estimations of just how much power, CO2e and water a single prompt consumes, and everyone (myself included) seems to just pick what fits their narrative best.
    - deleted 2mo ago
      [deleted]
    - deleted 2mo ago
      [deleted]
    - Razengan 2mo ago
      [flagged]
    - elcritch 2mo ago
      The data centers are spurring new investment and building of nuclear power plants, which are going to be critical infrastructure for any stable and reliable carbon neutral power generation future, IMHO.
      - inigyou 2mo ago
        When stable government collapses they're also going to be involuntary nature reserves.
        elcritch 2mo ago
        Not with modern fail-safe designs.
        inigyou 2mo ago
        Doesn't have to be a Chernobyl. Fuel leaching into the groundwater works just as well. And nobody has found a way to store those safely without continued maintenance.
        elcritch 2mo ago
        We have plenty of solutions for spent fuel storage as well as recycling fuel now. We just have NIMBY folks who protest it because they’re scared of “nuclear”.
        inigyou 2mo ago
        Nobody has ever invented one that survives by itself for the long term.
- darrenf 2mo ago
  In fairness, it’s literally called the jellyfish roundabout on the local bus timetables (as I know from having visited and caught the 450) https://www.ssl.fo/en/timetable/bus/450-torshavn-eysturoy-jellyfish-roundabout https://www.ssl.fo/en/timetable/bus/450-torshavn-eysturoy-je...
hoppp 2mo ago
Yeah, I was expecting jellyfish I'm disappointed.
Tomte 2mo ago
Flag it. Seriously. It‘s against the rules.
hydrogen7800 2mo ago
Yea, but that's what they call it. No editorializing on my part.

Notably, nothing to do with jellyfish.

by rendaw 2mo ago

Notably, nothing to do with jellyfish.

I think certain titles do well because they become a sort of unintentional clickbait. I absolutely expected this to be about marine biology. The original title, "World's First Undersea Roundabout," is much clearer. </crotchety_old_man>

Razengan 2mo ago
This is actually where LLMs save us from scummy human clickbait and shit, I can just ask ChatGPT etc to summarize an article and go on with my life while the AI suffers :')
- unkeen 2mo ago
  Whilst the world suffers because more and more let's say "not entirely climate-neutral" data centres are being built beause you were to lazy to read an article you mean.
  - vixen99 2mo ago
    Nothing to stop you making assumptions if you feel you have to.
  - paulluuk 2mo ago
    It depends on so many factors. Reading a long article on your laptop is likely less efficient than letting an LLM summarize it for you and then only reading the summary, while reading the article on your phone would be even more efficient. There are a lot of very contradictory estimations of just how much power, CO2e and water a single prompt consumes, and everyone (myself included) seems to just pick what fits their narrative best.
  - deleted 2mo ago
    [deleted]
  - deleted 2mo ago
    [deleted]
  - Razengan 2mo ago
    [flagged]
  - elcritch 2mo ago
    The data centers are spurring new investment and building of nuclear power plants, which are going to be critical infrastructure for any stable and reliable carbon neutral power generation future, IMHO.
    - inigyou 2mo ago
      When stable government collapses they're also going to be involuntary nature reserves.
      - elcritch 2mo ago
        Not with modern fail-safe designs.
        inigyou 2mo ago
        Doesn't have to be a Chernobyl. Fuel leaching into the groundwater works just as well. And nobody has found a way to store those safely without continued maintenance.
        elcritch 2mo ago
        We have plenty of solutions for spent fuel storage as well as recycling fuel now. We just have NIMBY folks who protest it because they’re scared of “nuclear”.
        inigyou 2mo ago
        Nobody has ever invented one that survives by itself for the long term.
darrenf 2mo ago
In fairness, it’s literally called the jellyfish roundabout on the local bus timetables (as I know from having visited and caught the 450) https://www.ssl.fo/en/timetable/bus/450-torshavn-eysturoy-jellyfish-roundabout https://www.ssl.fo/en/timetable/bus/450-torshavn-eysturoy-je...

hoppp 2mo ago

Yeah, I was expecting jellyfish I'm disappointed.

Tomte 2mo ago

Flag it. Seriously. It‘s against the rules.

hydrogen7800 2mo ago

Yea, but that's what they call it. No editorializing on my part.