7 ms·
We agree with this sentiment. Our goal is to supplement children with effective learning, NOT replace humans. This article can provide a little more context on
by catalinvoss 2mo ago
We agree with this sentiment. Our goal is to supplement children with effective learning, NOT replace humans.
This article can provide a little more context on how we're thinking about this:
https://www.ello.com/blog/ai-should-make-clear-what-reality-is https://www.ello.com/blog/ai-should-make-clear-what-reality-...
- geoffmanning 2mo agoIn your article you hit the nail on the head on why this should not be used for developing minds, especially between the ages of 5-7, though i would consider using your product after that. This age range is a critical period for theory of mind, executive function scaffolding, pragmatic language development, and attentional regulation. This technology directly intersects with these maturing systems.
- 28304283409234 2mo agoI applaud your dreams and hopes. I don't share them though, and predict this type of device will destroy countless meaningfull parent-child-teacher relationship.
- fatata123 2mo ago[dead]