6 ms·
Arguably, they're a better choice for customers than a shutdown. I mean, they're at least keeping the service alive for as long as possible.
by cs702 2mo ago
Arguably, they're a better choice for customers than a shutdown.
I mean, they're at least keeping the service alive for as long as possible.
- w4der 2mo agoI'd argue it's worse for consumers, by keeping them alive it staves off competition, and leeches cash by increasing subscription prices or locking once free feature behind paywalls.
- taurath 2mo agoThere’s no choice here, and often the companies are profitable, but if there is any stickiness to the product the customer gets the privilege of having a company they built trust with turn around and betray them with massively increased fees.