5 ms·
This is still ridiculously expensive imagine having to pay $10 for 100 search results on Google, thats essentially what this is. I really dont see how anyone's
by ai_fry_ur_brain 2mo ago
This is still ridiculously expensive imagine having to pay $10 for 100 search results on Google, thats essentially what this is.
I really dont see how anyone's willing spend more than $1.50 per mm output. Let alone $15-50. Does anyone actually pay for usage based billing as a consumer?
- iFire 2mo agoThis is pretty cheap compared to anthropic opus and fable. https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing Model Base Input Tokens 5m Cache Writes 1h Cache Writes Cache Hits & Refreshes Output Tokens Claude Fable 5 $10 / MTok $12.50 / MTok $20 / MTok $1 / MTok $50 / MTok Claude Opus 4.8 $5 / MTok $6.25 / MTok $10 / MTok $0.50 / MTok $25 / MTok Note Fable costs $50 MTok and Opus 4.8 costs $25 / MTok.
- k__ 2mo agoYeah, DeepSeek V4 (Flash and Pro) is below $0.004 for 1M cache hits. Even with usage based billing I'm below $1 writing code all day.
- ai_fry_ur_brain 2mo agoYes, this is the only pricing that seems sustainable
- throwa356262 2mo agoWhat harness do you use to get that? Reasonix?
- k__ 2mo agoPi
- bwfan123 2mo ago> I'm below $1 writing code all day. same, pi as a harness works best, better than claude code and open code.
- RazorBucksICO 2mo agoSometimes. It depends on the task. $15/Mtok is still a lot cheaper than human written code. It’s probably worth spending more for contract reviews. Tasks don’t have uniform value. If you’re using an AI for entertainment, then frontier premiums are hard to justify. For paid work, they’re a great deal if used reasonably.