> in my experience, a change that stays local in Go ripples through lifetimes and trait bounds in Rust imo extensive use of generics/trait bounds and explicit

> in my experience, a change that stays local in Go ripples through lifetimes and trait bounds in Rust imo extensive use of generics/trait bounds and explicit lifetimes in Rust is a huge code smell. Large projects should be making liberal use of trait objects and smart pointers to keep everything understandable and modular. Giving an agent a simple coding practice SOP for Rust should be enough to garuntee basically the same localized refactorability that Go has.