7 ms·
Wow, it's using NATS! I used NATS extensively 10+ years ago, and I'm happy to hear it's still around. Our infrastructure had hiccups across our fleet of machine
by lofties 2mo ago
Wow, it's using NATS! I used NATS extensively 10+ years ago, and I'm happy to hear it's still around. Our infrastructure had hiccups across our fleet of machines, but one part that always remained up and running without complaining on some dinky machine was NATS. Well, that and Redis. No complaints ever.
- freakynit 2mo agoWe are building something B2B expected to have good enough scale ... we had to choose between kafka, nats, redpanda and rabbitMQ .... We went ahead with NATS .... don't know why, but, when we went through all the docs, including setup and operational, NATS just felt right.
- bobkb 2mo agoWe are in the same decision making stage and trying to choose between rabitMQ, Kafka, NATS and some solutions built on top of Redis. Did NATS eventually worked well?
- freakynit 2mo agoExcellent. We already tested at okayish scale of 5 million messages per minute, with each message being less than 1KiB. Do note that NATS can easily handle 100x this scale. It's just what we had tested during initial days.
- bobkb 2mo agoWow! I have a stupid question - as I understand NATS works very well as a “message” pipe/bus. Anyway to get Redis type cache functionality as well ? Is it something possible ?
- freakynit 2mo agoJetStream (not NATS) has a built-in key/value store. Relevant thread (old, from 2023): https://github.com/nats-io/nats.go/discussions/1507 https://github.com/nats-io/nats.go/discussions/1507 someone did some benchmarks in 2025: nats bench kv put --size="128" --msgs 1000000 --storage file 1m3s → Pub stats: 15,656 msgs/sec ~ 1.91 MB/sec nats bench kv get --size="128" --msgs 1000000 59s → Sub stats: 16,720 msgs/sec ~ 2.04 MB/sec I have personally not used this though.
- bobkb 2mo agoThank you! Jetstream looks useful. For a platform which is production our Redis costs are getting prohibitively high. I was on the look for alternatives and perhaps in the software reliability tool [0] I am buildin try out Jetstream. [0] https://github.com/bobinson/vulture https://github.com/bobinson/vulture
- freakynit 2mo agoCool... "vulture" looks pretty good... especially more now-a-days. Thanks.. I also maintain these sites for npm related attacks (since there have been so many since past 1.5 years): 1. Techniques exploited: https://npm-supply-chain-attack-techniques.pagey.site/ https://npm-supply-chain-attack-techniques.pagey.site/ 2. Documented attacks: https://npm-supply-chain-attacks-25-26.pagey.site/ https://npm-supply-chain-attacks-25-26.pagey.site/
- withinboredom 2mo agoI’d also recommend looking at Swytch (docs.getswytch.com, particularly the economics page). Disclosure: I’m a founder.
- hendrikmans 2mo agoHi, Chatto developer here. NATS and its built-in Jetstream stream persistence engine are a miracle. I love them both so much. And if your app is itself written in Go, you can just embed them for simple deployment scenarios (like Chatto does.)
- moeffju 2mo agoInspired by Chatto, I also built some prototypes on the NATS (+Go) stack and it's been a dream. Feels like a severely under-hyped technology :D