6 ms·
> ~50% of Americans voted for the party that is diametrically opposed to them Less than half of the US population voted in the last election. ~50% of Americans
by cweagans 2mo ago
> ~50% of Americans voted for the party that is diametrically opposed to them
Less than half of the US population voted in the last election. ~50% of Americans _who voted_ voted for the party that is diametrically opposed to unions, but that group is only ~23% of _Americans_.
- ThrowawayR2 2mo agoMore voter turnout wouldn't have changed anything. From https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/26/2024-election-turnout-trum-00426544 https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/26/2024-election-turno... , "The survey suggests that 'if all Americans eligible to vote in 2024 had cast ballots, the overall margin in the popular vote likely would not have been much different'" This also matches what Democratic-leaning pollsters like David Shor have said in their own analyses.
- cweagans 2mo agoIt's important to understand that what we have, we have because of a comparatively small group of people. That's important and interesting because it means you can influence the outcome of an election in two ways: 1. Get people to change sides. This is difficult: people who already vote in a particular way are unlikely to change because of external pressures (and in fact, are more likely to dig their heels in if challenged on their views); or 2. Get more people to vote. This can be challenging in its own way, but can also just boil down to logistics problems. Whether or not 100% voter turnout would have the same results is neither here nor there. If you accept that premise + the premise that the vast majority of American voters vote down the party line for one of the major two, then you have potentially 2x the number of voters for your desired outcome. All you have to do is go find them and get them to vote.