5 ms·
> Only two remote holes in the default install, in a heck of a long time! https://www.openbsd.org/ https://www.openbsd.org/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open
by uticus 2mo ago
> Only two remote holes in the default install, in a heck of a long time!
https://www.openbsd.org/ https://www.openbsd.org/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenBSD#Security_record https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenBSD#Security_record
- anonym29 2mo agoLPE (to root) is serious, but it's not a remote hole.
- ptx 2mo agoIs this functionality accessible from sandboxed processes? That would make a remote hole much more dangerous when one is found, anyway. The CVE seems to concern SysV semaphores and the pledge(2) man page doesn't seem to mention those.
- brynet 2mo agoNo. https://github.com/openbsd/src/blob/d5b0ed23b6fe61f0278c37a42144770d19494ee7/sys/kern/kern_pledge.c#L91 https://github.com/openbsd/src/blob/d5b0ed23b6fe61f0278c37a4... Perhaps relevant, Students from the University of Southern Denmark released a paper earlier this month, which once again noted the fact that over ~90% of the OpenBSD base system uses pledge(2). Almost certainly all of the network speaking daemons in base do. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03056 https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03056