8 ms·
Every year it feels more surprising how motorcycling is still allowed. No seatbelt, no ABS, no problem...
by 0x000xca0xfe 2mo ago
Every year it feels more surprising how motorcycling is still allowed. No seatbelt, no ABS, no problem...
- waynesonfire 2mo agobecause when crashing on a motorcycle, it's only the cyclists face that's turned inside out and in such a way that it's not a burden on society to treat a vegetable.
- fckgw 2mo agoMotorcyclists don't usually kill an entire generation of people when they T-bone a mid-sized sedan in an intersection. That's the problem.
- 0x000xca0xfe 2mo agoTrue, but there are quite lightweight cars and heavy motorcycles. Lower damage potential of small and light cars compared to SUVs does not seem to give them a free pass to skip the sprawling driver assistance regulations.
- HDBaseT 2mo agoWearing a seatbelt or not doesn't also prevent a family getting killed, yet its strict in cars, but not on bikes? What gives?
- SugarReflex 2mo agoI don't know about other countries, but public transport buses in Australia don't have seat belts on them. Even as a kid, I remember wondering why there was such a fuss made around seat belts in cars when you couldn't use one if you wanted to on the bus. It was funny, when I went to the Philippines for the first time, I got into a cab and was trying to put my seat belt on when everyone laughed and said "no no you don't need to do that" - and it ended up feeling super normal to not wear a seat belt there anyway.
- userbinator 2mo agoBuses in America don't have seatbelts either. They're just so big and heavy relatively to cars that you're very unlikely to be seriously injured. (It does happen of course, and that usually makes the news.)