You have a great build up for an argument but why this conclusion? At some point who should be doing ethics? Lawyers? Computer scientists? (I'm not asking iron

You have a great build up for an argument but why this conclusion? At some point who should be doing ethics? Lawyers? Computer scientists? (I'm not asking ironically, who really is well placed to make population level and extremely though questions like balancing the protection of the few against a global important health interest/gain?)