5 ms·

i'm so tired of those HN blog articles where the title is always someone over confidently claiming something they have no expertise over (sorry, being a softwar

• komali2 2mo ago
  I wrote it, and I invite you to tell me why I'm wrong - genuinely. I'm here for the conversation. I don't know how else to write on something other than authoritatively. If I'm wrong on the internet, people will definitely tell me! In person, I'll hedge of course, it's a natural part of conversing and inviting people to share. Arguing whether someone is permitted to speak on a subject sounds like it would take as much effort as simply discussing the subject itself.
• flossly 2mo ago
  I really liked the article. Sure maybe the title of the original article is a little clickbaity; but are article titles not supposed to be "drawing your attention"? The author is doing really cool things, like a worker-coop for software engineering: https://508.dev/pricing https://508.dev/pricing Also i think the article contained some interesting points. Like the "class consciousness" of the owner-class and how this affects decisions on AI. But, to me, there were more. Anyway, to each their own. I liked it.
• lostmsu 2mo ago
  > a job market expert nor a historian I would not expect a job market "expert" or a historian to be able to predict future world where cumulative machine intelligence is higher than cumulative human intelligence. Why would you?
• mchaver 2mo ago
  > I wish there were options on HN to filter out "my opinion is a fact and you're all wrong" articles Don't wish. Just vibecode it for your personal use. Seriously.