> winning at life What a take. Of a character that is, albeit incredibly entertaining to watch, not displayed in a good light at all. Alternatively, he's ever

> winning at life What a take. Of a character that is, albeit incredibly entertaining to watch, not displayed in a good light at all. Alternatively, he's everything that's wrong with the system. He's certainly not generating any value to society. But yeah, in a purely individualistic take, he's certainly winning at life. While making everyone else's a bit worse.