5 ms·
I agree. We're seeing more variants of "RAG" that aren't semantic at all (e.g. coding agents or simple memory systems that feed summary indexes directly into co
by red_hare 2mo ago
I agree. We're seeing more variants of "RAG" that aren't semantic at all (e.g. coding agents or simple memory systems that feed summary indexes directly into context).
I think, over time, it's going to become a SQL / NoSQL sort of divide. There will be the right kind of RAG for the job and lots of forcing the wrong kind because the developer doesn't understand the nuances.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]