6 ms·
Interesting. But if Sam really believes that the US public should share in the benefits of AI surely the number should be 50% not 5%.
by Traster 3mo ago
Interesting. But if Sam really believes that the US public should share in the benefits of AI surely the number should be 50% not 5%.
- oliver-rock 3mo agoWhy 50% and not 100%? The obvious answer is it creates strange incentives. Maybe something like 5% across the board for all large tech companies make sense?
- ralferoo 3mo agoOr instead, they could just continue the simple route of taxing companies via corporation tax and dividend tax without having to worry about ownership at all.
- logicalappeals 3mo agoAgreed. 5% seems like enough to throw a dog a bone, but not have enough skin in the game
- cucumber3732842 3mo agoWhat's your basis for conflating government ownership with public benefit? Seems to me like it creates a lot of perverse incentives.
- reverius42 3mo agoI agree, I think we should go back to the old system of letting them be fully private and just taxing their gains heavily to pay for the public debts/needs.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]