7 ms·
Fable open sourced NanoClaw's agent factory. It cost $800
- escape_key 3mo agoxcancel link: https://xcancel.com/i/article/2072432348805669139 https://xcancel.com/i/article/2072432348805669139
- bearjaws 3mo agoSince its behind an account wall, I can't tell if they are saying that Opus made the clone for cheaper or that Opus failed? It appears that Fable did far more "work" based on output tokens. Aside: We should just ban Twitter links. Nobody should be required to make an account to view content on here.
- rpdillon 3mo agoYeah, I have to manually edit the URL to be xcancel instead every time. Maybe there's a grease monkey script around that handles this kind of thing. I can write one if not. Edit: going to try this out https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/531615-x-com-to-xcancel-com-redirector https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/531615-x-com-to-xcancel-co...
- WithinReason 3mo agoA general one that covers xcancel: https://einaregilsson.com/redirector/ https://einaregilsson.com/redirector/ Use this: Redirect: https://x.* https://x.* to: https://xcancel.$1 https://xcancel.$1
- shaewest 3mo agoOn the aside, where's the difference between someone posting a Twitter link and an Economist link? Both are locked behind a wall, whether it account-wall or pay-wall.
- bearjaws 3mo agoWe can ban those too.
- sourcecodeplz 3mo agoif we would ban everything that is not 100%: free, ad-free, tracker free what would we be left to read? couple of snarky remarks and maybe 2-3 paragraph of coherent text. journalism is a job! money has to come from somewhere
- kbelder 3mo agoWell, restricting posts to those actually accessible isn't unreasonable. Allowing them is HN's worst policy, in my humble opinion.
- CamperBob2 3mo agoThe Economist isn't owned by someone who cheats at video games, subverts the government, and thinks Nazi salutes are funny.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- benj111 3mo agoSame with medium. Why?
- WithinReason 3mo agoxcancel supports articles now: https://xcancel.com/i/article/2072432348805669139 https://xcancel.com/i/article/2072432348805669139 Here is the result: https://github.com/nanocoai/nanoclaw/pull/2742 https://github.com/nanocoai/nanoclaw/pull/2742
- Jimmy0252 3mo ago[dead]
- kylehotchkiss 3mo agoIt's really unusual that developers would rather write behind a twitter authwalled link than to write to their own site and just tweet about it. If you can spend $800 on Fable in a day, you can launch a fantastic looking/performing personal site in 15 minutes ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Perhaps Hacker News could ban this style of link to help encourage that?
- supriyo-biswas 3mo agoBut then you couldn’t engagement-farm like Twitter /s
- hadlock 3mo agoI guess if you enjoy engaging with an echo chamber
- sourcecodeplz 3mo agonowdays people get their reading on social media. social media, also started heavily demoting posts with external links. thus if you want reach, you need to post on platforms...
- cadamsdotcom 3mo agoI’m confused. The post is a long description of merging one branch into another in a clean way, done by agents, at a scale never seen before. Bravo. Does it do anything now that it didn’t before? Who’s this for? Why did it matter? Is the world better now? Unfortunately the post doesn’t discuss outcomes so I’m having a hard time seeing how the team’s $800 was best spent on this vs. some other priority.
- jsnell 3mo agoThis reads like AI-generated slop, flagging.