18 ms·
About the - humans aren't accurate either - 'argument'. Why replace people with something objectively worse and more unpredictable?
by louwrentius 3mo ago
About the - humans aren't accurate either - 'argument'.
Why replace people with something objectively worse and more unpredictable?
- Chu4eeno 3mo agoThey aren't necessarily worse and more unpredictable. IIRC. hallucination levels for the frontier levels are below equivalent average normal human errors, and they might even be more systematic/predictable to some degree. But even if they were slightly worse and more unpredictable, they are many times faster and cheaper, for some tasks.
- louwrentius 3mo agoThat word 'some' does quite a bit of heavy lifting. Because there is a ton of work that people tend to perform that falls out the scope of that 'some'. And a lot of work requires alignment with other people, and so on. LLMs don't have agency, despite people hyping 'agents'.
- Chu4eeno 3mo ago> That word 'some' does quite a bit of heavy lifting. No, I was just indicating I was not a sith.
- ta9923428974 3mo ago[dead]