11 ms·
Enough to convince a jury of their peers.
by will4274 3mo ago
Enough to convince a jury of their peers.
- cool_dude85 3mo agoQuestion begging, basically. The contention is that they were railroaded and maliciously overprosecuted, it's hard for the answer to be "enough to convince a jury of their peers."
- mathisfun123 3mo ago99% of people on this forum (and elsewhere) understand neither the phrase "begging the question" nor the logical fallacy (petitio principii). And thus people are imprisoned. It's sad but this is where we are (and probably always have been).
- ndsipa_pomu 3mo agoMaybe, but what was that evidence? The U.S. administration seems to not require evidence for lots of statements and especially regarding ICE (c.f. statements made about Renee Good after she was murdered).