well you can pick between the party that wants higher taxes, or the party that wants lower taxes for the rich. you can vote for the party that wants closed bord

well you can pick between the party that wants higher taxes, or the party that wants lower taxes for the rich. you can vote for the party that wants closed borders because people vote for them on that issue but who always do whatever their their corporate lobbyists want (protip: they want to pay lower wages), or you can vote for the party that openly hates white people and thinks they dont vote correctly so they should be replaced with foreigners who vote as directed. you can vote for the party that complains housing is getting more expensive while the states they run is full of the most expensive housing on average, or you can vote for the party who thinks deregulating everything is economically smart, but wont pass cost savings on to the buyer so the investment companies who only build communal housing and mcmansions see any benefit from it while your expensive shack falls apart in a decade or so. but at least historically both parties agree that censorship is good, encryption should be kept from the plebs, and israel should get whatever it wants with a minimum of performative resistance sometimes. or rather this: which party thinks that the rush to build ai data centers which are meant to create a chinese style ai surveillance state should be stopped on the premise that americans are survelied enough already and manipulated enough online as it is? there isnt one? if these parties were truly enemies they wouldnt consolidate more governmental power because obviously this power will fall into their enemies hands if there is a party switch in the federal government.