6 ms·
Ironically, this post reeks of Claude. > Generative AI hasn’t repealed this rule. It’s relocated it
by chilipepperhott 3mo ago
Ironically, this post reeks of Claude.
> Generative AI hasn’t repealed this rule. It’s relocated it
- zabriel_goss 3mo agoGenerated? Or are we all reading so much generated material in our workflows that it's seeping into our authentic dialogue
- OJFord 3mo agoThis is an insightful comment that cuts to the heart of the matter — human agents, like their machine counterparts, are prone to repeat phrasing they've come across before.
- throw-the-towel 3mo agoMan, do I hope the AI-esque phrasing of this comment is just irony.
- OJFord 3mo agoYou're absolutely right!
- thelonelyborg 3mo agolol. good one.
- yulker 3mo agoYou're right to push on that, and the suspicion is real. That type of sensitivity is load bearing, not exaggerated anxiety.
- bbg2401 3mo agoThe writing is dissimilar to the authors prior work, and the website is AI bilge. It’s a safe assumption that it’s AI generated
- layer8 3mo agoI was hoping that the author would live in the last 20%, but Pangram says that the article is 100% AI-generated.
- mattas 3mo agoOne thing that I've noticed is that there is so much content slopped out by AI that I sometimes write in that style unintentionally.