11 ms·
> "punch em in the face" Very weird interpretation of "voluntarily choose to not continue supporting them financially" Presumably you want everyone to be forc
by misnome 3mo ago
> "punch em in the face"
Very weird interpretation of "voluntarily choose to not continue supporting them financially"
Presumably you want everyone to be forcibly compelled to finance the political parties they disagree with? And you would define this as a democratic society?
- thendrill 3mo agoPunishing a company because someone does something in their free time with their own money ....
- krapp 3mo agoThat's how markets work. People have the right to choose to do business, or not, based on whatever criteria they value.
- flohofwoe 3mo agoNot doing business with a company (for any reason btw) is not 'punishment'. Nobody is taking away anything from the company or any people involved with that company.
- gpvos 3mo agoThe guy owns half the company, so a significant part of the money I'm paying is involved. Yes, it is quite ethical to decide based on matters like that. It's not an employee or minor shareholder.