4 ms·
It's attacking civilians that's controversial.
by cloche 3mo ago
It's attacking civilians that's controversial.
- dotancohen 3mo agoI never advocated attacking civilians. If you are suggesting that the Iranian military uses civilian human shields, then maybe you should reconsider which side you support.
- slater 3mo ago> why is "glass the entire country" not an option? > I never advocated attacking civilians.
- dotancohen 3mo agoI did not realize that "glass the entire country" means to use nuclear weapons. Maybe I don't watch enough movies. I'm all for attacking Iranian military assets across Iran, but obviously not the civilians if that can be avoided.
- slater 3mo ago> I did not realize that "glass the entire country" means to use nuclear weapons. what the...? where did you think the term comes from? o.0
- scheme271 3mo agoI'm not sure how anyone can take that assertion in good faith. It's like saying that you want to bomb a country back to the stone age and then saying that you didn't realize that it meant attacking civilian infrastructure.