7 ms·
How does it differ from pirating music or movies?
by steinvakt2 3mo ago
How does it differ from pirating music or movies?
- pornel 3mo agoMachine-extruded text is not copyrightable, since there was no human creativity involved in producing it. (and if you argue the US models do produce copyrighted works, then oooops - whose copyright is it huh?)
- steinvakt2 3mo agoI see. Fair point
- bethekidyouwant 3mo agoOw my head.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- Balinares 3mo agoAccording to US AI labs, training on other people's output is fair use. So that's how.
- ReptileMan 3mo agoThat when I pay for a model, the copyright of the output belongs to me. This is as work for hire as it gets.
- Zigurd 3mo agoAI training is considered transformational. That's how AI training gets around copyright and it's probably consistent with copyright precedent. For example, indexing the web is considered transformational, even though you can recover the full text of everything in an inverted index.
- anon373839 3mo agoThere is no intellectual property to “pirate”. Model outputs don't qualify for copyright. They aren’t patented. They aren’t trade secrets - the companies sell them. They aren’t trademarks, obviously. They are nothing, actually.