4 ms·
That’s an interesting way to think about it. While tests don’t satisfy mathematicians‘ standards for rigor one could instead look at interactive proofs from com
by mockerell 3mo ago
That’s an interesting way to think about it. While tests don’t satisfy mathematicians‘ standards for rigor one could instead look at interactive proofs from complexity theory. These are of interest if a problem doesn’t allow for short proofs, i.e. when the problem is not in NP [1].
In your scenario an adapted AI-assisted theorem prover would be the prover, and a mathematician the verifier.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactive_proof_system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactive_proof_system
- jdw64 3mo agoThank you for explaining my point more logically and coherently. I'll read it over.