5 ms·
Who exactly is “coordinating” that effort? Surely everyone except the datacenter builders and the big hosted AI models has exactly the opposite incentive.
by aroman 3mo ago
Who exactly is “coordinating” that effort? Surely everyone except the datacenter builders and the big hosted AI models has exactly the opposite incentive.
- angoragoats 3mo ago> Who exactly is “coordinating” that effort? The datacenter builders and the big hosted AI models. The person you're replying to even mentions OpenAI by name.
- varispeed 3mo agoThe rich.
- fsflover 3mo agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673500 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673500
- kamranjon 3mo agoI think one of the more ominous things to see in recent years was all of the tech execs at the presidential inauguration, after having collectively donated several million dollars to the inauguration fund. So if we go with that list, which happens to overlap with many of the circular deals we’ve seen in the AI space recently, you’d have people like: Sam Altman, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Tim Cook, Sundar Pichai and Sergey Brin I also wouldn’t be surprised if memory providers weren’t intimately involved, as they’ve been caught price fixing in the past: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRAM_price_fixing_scandal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRAM_price_fixing_scandal
- bigyabai 3mo agoWe have to get real, here - most people are not replacing GPT or Claude with local inference, even on M5. If you can afford to do that (RAM shortage or not), then you are in the minority of customers. Alleviating the memory constraint would only really make Nvidia a danger to cloud margins, and their consumer sales are neutered while they focus on the datacenter segment. It's feels facetious to insinuate that people would be doing inference on their Macbook Neo or Wintel laptop if they only had a gorbillion gigabytes of memory and a 400W accelerator card plugged into the wall outlet.
- kamranjon 3mo agoYou’re out of the loop if you don’t think m series chips with unified memory aren’t one of the best platforms for running local inference
- bigyabai 3mo agoThey aren't. Apple Silicon is unusable for interactive prefill and decode speeds in agentic workflows and SOTA LLMs.
- kamranjon 3mo agoYou’re just out of the loop, and that’s fine but it’s worth learning about. There is a pretty large and growing community of us using entirely local models for our agentic flows. From GLM 4.7 flash on 32gb machines with >60tok/s to Gemma and Qwen dense and MOE models on 64gb machines all the way up to Deepseek V4 flash on 128gb machines with 450tok/s prefill and 25-30tok/s decode. I use DS4 on the daily - it’s become my main model. I know it’s in fashion to talk trash about Apple but their hardware outperforms other options like DGX Sparc when it comes to local inference, they got the unified memory, memory bandwidth and the GPU cores to actually be useful in a way that most other hardware just isn’t.
- aroman 3mo agoMy hardware isn't powerful enough to try, so I'm asking out of genuine curiosity, not to push back: what do you use DS4 for? Did it replace e.g Claude Code with Opus for you, or was it replacing something else?
- kamranjon 3mo agoI use it as my main coding agent - so its running DS4 server on my 128gb mbp and I run the pi coding agent on my other machine which calls out to it. Mostly Go and Typescript work. I also use it in local agent mode if im coding directly on the machine which is nice cause you can save sessions and resume them, and so for personal projects and training related stuff it's been great. Even got an autoresearch loop going where the agent looks at the previous run, adjusts parameters and code if needed, and then hands off training to another script (so full system resources are available for training), ad infinitum - it works really well - what antirez has done with that project is pretty incredible.