5 ms·
Being the lesser of two evils doesn't make it right. It's also possible to not have loot boxes at all.
by Loocid 3mo ago
Being the lesser of two evils doesn't make it right. It's also possible to not have loot boxes at all.
- protocolture 3mo agoThe "lesser" of 2 evils here isnt practicing evil?
- ondiendkendkw 3mo agoLoot boxes are, by any and all definitions, evil. It’s gambling. Worse even, it’s gambling with real money over digital ephemera. Loot boxes are not a fun mechanic. Loot boxes are not designed to entertain you or give you good value for your money. Loot boxes only exist to make you gamble with your money over something that could easily be sold as a single purchase item, or better yet, be rewarded in-game. Simple as that. It’s a gambling scheme. Always has been. Always will be.
- protocolture 3mo agoGambling is a game mechanic. It can be evil. But if its restricted to non game affecting items for people over the age of 18 it isnt evil. Its completely optional. I remember playing CS:GO and ignoring the loot boxes until fridays in the afternoon when my mate would come online and we would crack a couple together and put our new stickers on our guns.