6 ms·
A nuclear reactor in the Alberta Oil sands would take care of a large amount of the CO2 produced in the production of crude.
by mig39 3mo ago
A nuclear reactor in the Alberta Oil sands would take care of a large amount of the CO2 produced in the production of crude.
- _aavaa_ 3mo agoDoesn’t help with the burning part. Or the stranded infrastructure once the demand goes away.
- speed_spread 3mo agoDemand will not go away. There'll be toxic waste to clean up for decades after.
- bonesss 3mo agoNuclear process heat in refining would enable releasing less CO2 per fuel-unit. It doesn’t solve burning directly, but reduces the impact of what is going to happen anyways.
- theeyescanner 3mo ago[flagged]
- bluefirebrand 3mo agoAbsolutely ridiculous that I was down voted and flagged for some mild griping about the state of my province's inability to execute on infrastructure projects, but offhand jokes (I hope it's a joke) about nuking my home is completely fine? :/
- jibal 3mo agoRidiculous whataboutism. What makes you think that anyone thought that it's completely fine? The comment is dead.
- jibal 3mo agoDownvoted? Seriously? It's an objective fact that the comment is dead, which refutes the claim that people thought it's completely fine. And the comment has nothing to do with some totally different claim that was downvoted, thus it is objectively whataboutism, and obviously ridiculous.