5 ms·

I like that how in the same place that they have been trying to "protect the children" for like a decade [1], they have also had a real rape gang epidemic [2].

I like that how in the same place that they have been trying to "protect the children" for like a decade [1], they have also had a real rape gang epidemic [2]. It's almost like they are, in fact, not really trying to protect the children. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_age_verification_in_the_United_Kingdom https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_age_verification_in_the... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grooming_gangs_scandal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grooming_gangs_scandal Hilariously, a commenter asked me for a citation for the epidemic. Commenter: you're not mr current events are you?

inigyou 3mo ago
Citation was provided for "protect the children" but not for rape gang epidemic? But suppose there was a rape gang epidemic - wouldn't that be a good reason to want to protect the children?
- RandyRanderson 3mo ago
  It's import to solve the meta-issues here: 1 you didn't google current events before asking the first Q. Try that before asking someone else to. 2 mid-tier LLMs are capable of reasoning through your second Q. Go ahead try that next time. 3 you haven't accepted that 2 is true and the ramifications thereof.
  - inigyou 3mo ago
    the meta-meta issue is that you did not provide any response other than "just google it" and "just chatgpt it"