17 ms·
That doesn’t seem right - off the top of my head I think it’s more like 4 years? maybe it should be “103*4/2/52” (not “/12”) ? … hopefully the effective wait t
by LeonB 3mo ago
That doesn’t seem right - off the top of my head I think it’s more like 4 years?
maybe it should be “103*4/2/52” (not “/12”) ?
… hopefully the effective wait time is considerably shorter if a long line is taken as a demand signal, leading them to buy more.