7 ms·

Since they plan to have null-restricted types, then I don't see any issue.

• Dylan16807 3mo ago
  > plan to Well wasn't that the argument above, that the stuff they added so far isn't proper at least in part because they didn't fix that problem yet?
  • joe_mwangi 3mo ago
    > yet But up the comment section, someone thinks they won't be there 'in the future'
    • Dylan16807 3mo ago
      The comment that says it won't be there in the near future? That's seems like a reasonable claim to me. And a promise to eventually fix a busted implementation doesn't undo it being busted for a significant amount of time.
      • joe_mwangi 3mo ago
        Better late than never.