7 ms·
No worries
by jaas 3mo ago
No worries
- taspeotis 3mo agoThanks for securing the web
- sam_lowry_ 3mo agoThank them for making the web depend on a single US-based shady org, as if DNS was not enough.
- cpach 3mo agoFeel free to launch your own CA.
- sam_lowry_ 3mo agoNo-no, I would rather go back to the good old HTTP/1.1. P.S. JS injection into TCP packets and other meddling with passthrough data should be banned legally, not technically via encryption.
- soco 3mo agoI wish you good luck in court trying to get compensation for the damage you've got through a JS injection attack. Because people prefer to lock their valuables instead of constantly having to identify and sue thieves.
- sam_lowry_ 3mo agoNot court, regulation. Wanna be a carrier? Then don't meddle with traffic. Otherwise, you are liable for all the child porn and drug trade that happen to cross your boundary.
- soco 3mo agoRight, we actually agree on this. And where is regulation enforced? In courts. Who says the provider is liable? A court. This was my point: not locking your house means a lot of processing to get back to the place where you have been before - if it can ever happen. And I'd very much not go through a whole trial...
- sam_lowry_ 3mo agoRegulation is enforced in courts only in the US, heh.
- Natfan 3mo agoam i a carrier when i host my own wifi network?