You would think so. Strangely, even though warrants have to be specific, police are allowed to seize things they come across during the search, even if those th

You would think so. Strangely, even though warrants have to be specific, police are allowed to seize things they come across during the search, even if those things aren’t on the warrant ( https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/496/128/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/496/128/ ). It’s not a free-for-all, though. If the warrant is for a stolen car, the police can’t open up pill bottles during the search; they have to look in places where a stolen car could be hidden ( https://www.fletc.gov/audio/execution-search-warrant-i-mp3 https://www.fletc.gov/audio/execution-search-warrant-i-mp3 , do a text search for “elephant”). And the things being seized have to be obvious contraband ( https://www.rothdavies.com/criminal-defense/frequently-asked-questions-about-criminal-defense/searches/can-police-use-the-plain-view-exception-for-unrelated-evidence https://www.rothdavies.com/criminal-defense/frequently-asked... ).