9 ms·
Using laws to ban competitors is just economic warfare thats all. Its got nothing to do with "national security", thats just the reason they give us normies. Yo
by globalnode 3mo ago
Using laws to ban competitors is just economic warfare thats all. Its got nothing to do with "national security", thats just the reason they give us normies. You should be safe in Australia since they actually need to be friends with China.
- p-e-w 3mo agoWhat? Every country has the right to freely decide which companies are permitted to operate under its jurisdiction, and exercising that right isn’t “warfare” of any kind.
- inigyou 3mo agoWhat do you think warfare is?
- hsuduebc2 3mo agoPoeple talking about 'trade war' must drive you crazy.
- LtWorf 3mo agoI think the country that talks the most how the market regulates itself and needs no state intervention isn't the most qualified to put tariffs and block other countries from trade. And yet here we are…
- kingforaday 3mo ago> You should be safe in Australia since they actually need to be friends with China. As a non-Australian, I enjoyed very much reading about Australia in a book by Tim Marshall titled "The Power of Geography". I didn't quite realize just how vulnerable they become with China's ambitions and expanse in the South Pacific due to their reliance on vital sea lanes for trade with its Asian partners. After reading that book, I can appreciate your comment much more.
- incompatible 3mo agoLike some wag said recently, Australia needs nuclear submarines to protect its vital trade with China against China.
- re-thc 3mo ago> Using laws to ban competitors is just economic warfare thats all. Its got nothing to do with "national security" Economic safety is 1 angle of national security. They're not "wrong".
- zrn900 3mo agoEconomic safety can be guaranteed in many ways. It's not economic safety that these moves are for. It's for blocking anyone from preventing them from maximizing the value the Western oligarchs extract from both their own citizens and the entire world.