6 ms·
I don't think you can provide all the features of Kubernetes while reducing the complexity. What is possible is to support a subset of the features of Kubernete
by ajayvk 3mo ago
I don't think you can provide all the features of Kubernetes while reducing the complexity. What is possible is to support a subset of the features of Kubernetes while making it easy to use.
https://github.com/openrundev/openrun https://github.com/openrundev/openrun is a project I am building. It supports declarative deployments, on a single-node with Docker or onto Kubernetes. The target use cases is limited to standalone web app, like internal tools. No support for stateful services, you manage stateful services yourself. With that simplification, OpenRun provides a much easier developer experience.
- SOLAR_FIELDS 3mo agoI look forward to the evolution of your project into a less standardized Kubernetes as end users request more and more features of your project.
- ajayvk 3mo agoTargeting a specific use case (internal tools) should hopefully help avoid feature creep. Also, the goal is that an OpenRun config should work on a single-node with Docker and with Kubernetes. That limits the types of features which can be implemented (for example no Docker Compose support, no Helm support).
- SOLAR_FIELDS 3mo ago[dead]