6 ms·
It's often helpful not to immediately assume bad faith without further enquiry. It appears that Fabien had reviewed the book beforehand and he has reposted Joh
by sasas 3mo ago
It's often helpful not to immediately assume bad faith without further enquiry. It appears that Fabien had reviewed the book beforehand and he has reposted John Carmack's tweet[1] linking the book.
[1] https://x.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/2066577536339923091 https://x.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/2066577536339923091
- wk_end 3mo agoI thought "I'm sure it's not intentional" would make it clear that I'm not assuming bad faith - actually the opposite, I'm assuming good faith.
- sasas 3mo agoUnderstood. It's reasonable to call out potential conflict while also being unclear on intention. Something as simple in the Keen book author acknowledging the proofreader would put to rest the ambiguity central to the discussion point in contention.
- sasas 3mo agoTurns out it was intentional. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48550425 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48550425