8 ms·
There’s a reason Nordic countries do so well and are a real “first world”. They’re smart. In the good sense.
by 0xblinq 3mo ago
There’s a reason Nordic countries do so well and are a real “first world”. They’re smart. In the good sense.
- NuclearPM 3mo agoThis is a weird comment.
- rcbdev 3mo agoI'd argue that this (your) comment is much weirder. Could you provide a reason or point us at least to what you find so particularly weird?
- alsetmusic 3mo agoThe commenter doesn't recognize that nordic countries have exceptionally high quality of life despite less sunlight (a common cause of depression) than whatever country in which they likely reside. They aren't curious about the world enough to learn about others.
- Lio 3mo ago“First world”? First world is a political term meaning non-aligned with the West or Communist states during the Cold War. Historically, Sweden was a non-aligned country. The very definition of a “third-world” country.
- csomar 3mo agoThat's the original definition. I think now first, second, third are used to annotate which level of development a country is at. Especially that now, not all developing countries are equal.
- alsetmusic 3mo agoIt's more nuanced than that. First was the USA, the first nuclear state (and the west / allies). Then the Soviets. The Third World was the anticipated rise of the nations that would join us on the world stage, a hopeful and optimistic term[0]. Then we deliberately sabotaged them and kept them under our boot to extract resources. Third World is now a slight for developing nations. 0. The Jakarta Method (Vincent Bevins) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Jakarta_Method https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Jakarta_Method
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]