7 ms·
Claims of retribution aside, one steelman is that Mythos is likely the most capable model that's usable by folks like the NSA [1], and decision-makers across th
by lebovic 3mo ago
Claims of retribution aside, one steelman is that Mythos is likely the most capable model that's usable by folks like the NSA [1], and decision-makers across the USG and industry partners have seen a stream of reports of Mythos successfully finding serious vulnerabilities over the past couple months due to Glasswing.
So even if GPT 5.5 is just as capable in these scenarios (which, imo, it largely is), it is not known by the government apparatus as having the same capabilities.
Personally, I think we crossed the threshold of capabilities with Opus 4.6 [2], which translated to an even more capable open-weight GLM 5.1 (which it is rumored to have distilled Opus 4.6) [3][4]. But the USG and its partners aren't fully rational actors with perfect data, so it's possible they're only viscerally aware of these capabilities in the context of Mythos.
[1]: https://www.reuters.com/business/us-security-agency-is-using-anthropics-mythos-despite-blacklist-axios-reports-2026-04-19/ https://www.reuters.com/business/us-security-agency-is-using...
[2]: Opus 4.6 was used for https://www.noahlebovic.com/testing-an-autonomous-hacker/ https://www.noahlebovic.com/testing-an-autonomous-hacker/
[3]: See GLM 5.1 scoring in https://www.cybergym.io/cybergym/ https://www.cybergym.io/cybergym/
[4]: https://dualuse.dev/posts/chinese-models-are-sometimes-better-even-if-distilled https://dualuse.dev/posts/chinese-models-are-sometimes-bette...
- Topfi 3mo agoI doubt that the capabilities of GPT-5.5-cyber aren’t known by the US government considering OpenAI is their primary LLM partner after Anthropic had concerns about using models for autonomous weaponry and mass surveillance of US citizens. If anything, they should have more experience in GPT-5.5s full feature set due to longer access and may even already have GPT-5.6 access.
- lebovic 3mo agoThey made a deal for access, but I'm unsure if it's usable, scaled, and has vulnerabilities attributed to it at this point. But I have no inside information here, so I could be wrong.
- throwaway85825 3mo agoIf it had vulnerabilities the marketing copy would already be written and published.
- bobthepanda 3mo agoHanlon's razor. Are the people with the right access talking to the right people? Wouldn't be the first time for miscommunication in the executive branch.
- Topfi 3mo agoFair point, not unlikely, though my personal assumption is that, like with Nvidia export controls, there will be a sudden reversal with no tangible, actual, technically based reason the second a certain person has their ring kissed...
- bobthepanda 3mo agoWhy not both? The current executive has missed the mark on appointments pretty badly a number of times due to the prizing of loyalty over competency.
- nandomrumber 3mo ago[dead]